Walking through San Francisco’s North Beach neighborhood with an empty cup in hand after grabbing a slice of pizza at Tony’s, 99PI host Roman Mars faced a surprisingly difficult urban challenge: finding a public trash can. This minor frustration opens up an investigation into one of the most fundamental services a municipality provides. The absence of a simple receptacle reveals a complex system of behavioral psychology, municipal budgeting, and waste engineering, leading host Delaney Hall to investigate how the city manages its street-level infrastructure for an episode of Service Request.
San Francisco Public Works oversees roughly 3,000 public garbage cans, prioritizing placement near transit stops, schools, and busy commercial corridors. Rachel Gordon, the Director of Policy and Communications for the department, explains that the city also relies on public feedback and municipal requests to determine where new bins should be placed. However, managing this network is about more than just logistics. In 2017, the city launched the “Yes We Can” pilot in the Mission District, saturating a thirty-block radius with bins to test a widely held assumption that more receptacles would equal less litter.
Surprisingly, the sheer volume of cans did little to change human behavior. Pedestrians continued to drop wrappers right next to the bins, highlighting a local culture of waste where some treat public sidewalks like a hotel maid service, assuming a city worker or private contractor will inevitably sweep in to clean up the mess. This behavioral paradox led the city to pivot from increasing the quantity of bins to improving their quality. The existing “Renaissance” cans, deployed back in 1993, were aging and constantly battered by graffiti, vandalism, and aggressive foraging.

To find a sturdier replacement, the city developed three custom prototypes and selected three off-the-shelf models, deploying them across fifty-two diverse locations for real-world stress testing. The initiative quickly became a lightning rod for local pothole politics, drawing national media ire over the twenty thousand dollar price tag attached to the custom prototypes. However, this upfront cost was simply a standard research and development expense for fabricating one-off industrial designs engineered to withstand the unique rigors of the street.
After nearly 14,000 residents weighed in via QR codes, the city selected the “Slim Silhouette,” a narrow design wrapped in exterior stainless steel bars to deter graffiti. Now slated for mass production at a much more reasonable unit cost of around thirteen hundred dollars, the bins have been fine-tuned to accommodate larger items and feature hardened locks. Ultimately, finding the perfect intersection of aesthetics and utility proves that navigating the fraught municipal politics of a simple garbage can is a surprisingly complicated job.
Service Request is a production of 99% Invisible and Campside Media.

Comments (5)
Share
Curious what brands they tried. Victor Stanley has a can that can tell to when the bid is full and even if it’s extra smelly. Allowing workers to stop at the cans that need emptying and skip the ones that don’t.
Also as per the comment of it taking longer to pick trash cans than install skyscrapers, you should really look at home much time and coordination goes into that construction. Public feedback is always the longest step.
In Copenhagen, Denmark, a social entrepreneur developed a trash design that allowed people to deposit recyclable bottles and can outside the rim of the trash can in a sort of deep shelf. The purpose was to prevent people from having to go inside the trash can to get these recyclables. I met him in 2018 and he said that since recycling is a public good, the people collecting these bottles and cans were engaging in a collective service, and should do so with dignity rather than dumpster diving. The city agreed to develop the cans and deploy them because they had the additional benefit of cutting down on mess created when people were picking through the trash. I wish I could remember his name, he was famously also the person who developed the “Sex-lance” an ambulance redesigned to allow street sex workers a safe, clean, and warm place to provide their service (it was at the Copenhagen design museum for a while). Sadly, when I returned to Copenhagen in 2025 I only saw one of these. I would love to hear what led to them being replaced.
I particularly enjoyed this episode as one who finds street litter revolting, disgusting and almost insulting!
I live in an older residential neighborhood just outside Atlanta. Walking the neighborhood regularly for exercise, I have started carrying disposable gloves & plastic bags to pick up litter as I stroll. Empty cigarette packs, beer bottles, cans & take out debris are just the tip of the iceberg! Add to that the occasional dirty diaper, leftover food complete with plastic ware & I’ve just decided to purchase one of those “grabber” utensils to put more distance between myself and the crud.
I fondly remember street “sweepers” — large trucks with rotating brushes and streaming water– rolling down my Philadelphia street decades ago.
I don’t think community pride, cleanliness and respectability belong only to the past…or Do they?
Joy Johnson
Tucker GA
When I saw the title for this article, I was hoping for some commentary about the possibly urban myth that cities withdraw public trash cans because of households that dump their household garbage rather than pay for home garbage service.
Thank you for giving us some insight into the complexities of public trashcans.
One question:
If cues from the environment influence people’s behaviour (i.e., whether to litter or not), for the 2017 pilot, was the environment cleaned up at the same time that trash cans were installed? If so, it could have helped influence people to use the trash cans. If not, it would make for an interesting new pilot…